2027 Executive Business Conference · Jan 20–22, 2027 · Hollywood Beach, FL — registration is open →

Farmer Feedback: USDA

How farmers rate USDA crop data, why they skip the surveys, and what they say would win back their trust.

Average confidence (1 to 5)
1.93
Filled out a USDA survey in the last 24 months
38%
Willing to join a local listening session
61%
Average local FSA office rating
3.97
Median acres farmed or managed
1,750
Total acres represented
3.85M

1,199 of 1,199 responses

73% of respondents rate their confidence in USDA data a 1 or 2 out of 5. 4% give it a 4 or 5.

1 = no confidence5 = full confidence
Rated1 · 459
38%
Rated2 · 420
35%
Rated3 · 271
23%
Rated4 · 46
4%
Rated5 · 3
0%

Confidence by farm size

Average confidence in USDA data (1 to 5) and response count per size group

  • Under 500 acres1.93 · 120
  • 500 to 9992.05 · 201
  • 1,000 to 2,4991.94 · 437
  • 2,500 to 4,9991.89 · 257
  • 5,000 and up1.81 · 176

Where responses came from

Hover a state for details. Click one to filter the whole page.

0204

Responses by state

Click a row to filter. Click a heading to sort.

2041.8732%60%4.0
1751.8637%59%4.0
1402.1144%54%4.1
1161.8940%61%3.9
1001.9639%67%4.1
681.6634%57%3.8
651.8831%57%3.9
571.9339%65%4.0
562.1143%66%4.1
402.2353%58%3.8
272.1537%70%4.0
221.9136%73%3.7
131.8531%54%4.1
102.2060%70%4.8
91.5622%67%3.6
81.6363%88%4.0
82.3850%75%4.4
72.0029%100%4.1
72.0043%71%3.7
72.5729%57%3.3
72.0057%57%4.0
72.0043%57%4.3
42.0050%75%4.5
41.7550%75%3.0
41.5075%50%3.0
32.0033%33%4.3
31.33100%67%4.7
31.6733%100%3.0
22.00100%100%1.5
21.0050%50%3.5
21.500%50%2.5
11.00100%100%3.0
11.00100%100%3.0
12.000%100%3.0
11.000%0%2.0
11.000%100%3.0
12.000%0%3.0
14.00100%0%4.0

Skipped the survey

Respondents who have not filled out a USDA survey in 24 months, by main reason

738 skipped (62%). 605 picked a reason.

  • I don’t feel it matters34% · 208
  • Time consuming29% · 175
  • Redundant information24% · 146
  • I don’t want to share13% · 76

Filled out the survey

Respondents who did, by main reason

461 filled it out (38%). 448 picked a reason.

  • I believe the data is important54% · 240
  • I believe it is my duty19% · 85
  • Someone asked me nicely17% · 74
  • I fear repercussions of not filling it out11% · 49

Local FSA office rating

1 = poor, 5 = excellent

3%
Rated 1
6%
Rated 2
18%
Rated 3
36%
Rated 4
37%
Rated 5

What would restore trust

The option that best matches what each respondent thinks needs to happen

  • Partnering with private industry companies to get better data33% · 399
  • Radical change in survey and reporting30% · 357
  • More timely and accurate communication19% · 227
  • More conservative and realistic results early as compared to final yields and acres18% · 216

Trust-breaking incidents

Themes in what respondents named as the moment they lost trust. A response can hit more than one theme. Click a theme to read the responses.

888 wrote an answer. Shares are of those answers.

Farmer-proposed fixes

Themes in the ideas respondents gave for better information. Click a theme to read the responses.

1,173 wrote an answer. Shares are of those answers.

Crops grown

Share of respondents growing each crop

  • Corn96% · 1,151
  • Soybeans91% · 1,095
  • Wheat33% · 394
  • Pasture21% · 246
  • Hay/alfalfa7% · 89
  • Pulses/beans4% · 43
  • Sorghum/milo3% · 35
  • Small grains3% · 35
  • Vegetables2% · 24

Livestock raised

Share of respondents raising each species

  • Cattle37% · 439
  • Swine9% · 106
  • Poultry3% · 35
  • Sheep1% · 16
  • Goats1% · 11
  • Other0% · 3
  • None56% · 676

Read the responses

Written answers from the respondents matching your filters

888 responses

  • Could be wrong but prices seems to rally over non-harvest government shutdown periods. Also not a lot of data to back this up but there have always been farmers who refused goverment payments and such didnt participate in reporting acres. NASS is supposed to figure these acres somehow and I believe their methodology is outdated and error prone. The farmers who didnt participate in gov programs eventually quit/retire/bankrupt/etc.. and their acres tend to get consolidated to larger farm operations. These larger operations are probably utilizing gov programs and /some/ of them might be reporting acres (although without base acres they probably wouldn't be recieving payments I assume). I think NASS figures these acres wrong and there are some acres that are double counted. I think the national average is likely higher but the acres is low enough to offset any gain in total production. .
    Ohio · 500 to 999 acres · Confidence 2 of 5 · Filled out a survey
  • 2019 I believe was the year. They came out saying huge crop. Everyone was sold and moved on to 2020 when they came out and made a large correction. The market still didn’t move enough because it was old news and the market was on to new things like weather acres etc. The usda has essentially done the same thing again in 2026. The internet is full of information. Almost everything I see in fall of 2026 is average to below average crops. The crops in our area experienced extensive hail. The record yield we are slated for just doesn’t seem possible from the evidence I see. I believe they will go back and correct it after it’s too late and we have all lost $$$$$$. I believe this time it’s a gambit to get China to buy large amounts of US agricultural goods.
    Nebraska · 5,000 acres and up · Confidence 2 of 5 · Skipped the survey
  • Their data that they use to produce their reports are BOGUS! As my late father said 36+ years ago, "You need to remember that there are more consumers that vote than producers that vote". 2026 we all heard about inflation al year long. The USDA comes out and rather drop the 2025 crop we RAISE stocks. Then we follow that up with an inflated October WASDE report. My corn yields are 3.5% below y/a and 4% below the same fields 2 years ago. And from what I am hearing, y yields here in NW IA are at the top end of what's out there. After the 2019 acreage/prevent plant debacle in ND where it took the USDA 18 months to finally admit their error, why would anyone trust their data much less give them anymore information.
    Iowa · Under 500 acres · Confidence 2 of 5 · Filled out a survey
  • The "mistakes" they admitted to here in October about Sept 26 report and the mistake they admitted too late for the 2024 marketing year lowering effect were the hardest hits for me and other Nebraska producers. These reports proved to be inaccurate months after the damage to markets (producers) was already done and there is no way for farmers to fight back. I'm also tired of the subsidy payments that we keep getting as a poss poor "apology" from the government that keeps f*****g us over by waging war on people and markets globally that have caused our energy, fertilizer, chemicals, seed costs to skyrocket. Doesn't matter who you vote for, they're in the club and we aren't.
    Nebraska · Under 500 acres · Confidence 2 of 5 · Filled out a survey

1,199 responses received October 25 to 28, 2026. Themes come from keyword matching on written answers and are a guide, not an exact count. Written answers were reviewed before sharing: 14 had personal details redacted and 21 were removed for threatening or abusive content. 12 responses had a state entry that could not be matched and appear only in national totals. Swear words are starred out.

Survey and analysis by Ag View Solutions. To cite: Farmer Feedback: USDA, October 2026 survey of 1,199 farmers by Ag View Solutions, agviewsolutions.com/resources/farmer-feedback/2026-usda.